Significance: The death penalty, although infrequently applied, has symbolic importance and has sharply polarized public opinion. ¶20 But it does not follow from these unassailable principles that any mention of a litigant’s race or ethnicity5 is always constitutionally impermissible. (McCleskey v. Kemp… Description: The killing of a convict by the state for purposes of punishment or to reduce future crime. Georgia, Gregg v. Georgia, Penry v. Lynaugh, Payne v. Tennessee, and McCleskey v. Kemp, the volume also presents in-depth accounts of cases involving core capital issues, including: Representation Protections for the innocent, Proportionality limits, Execution methods, The problem of "volunteers",The guarantee of heightened reliability. The Supreme Court entered this fray only briefly, first to restrict executions, then to permit capital punishment, increasingly free of federal court supervision. Another death penalty decision of the Supreme Court is the 1987 case of McCleskey v. Kemp, in which the Court held that state death penalty statutes are constitutional even when statistics indicate that they have been applied in racially biased ways. You can write a book review and share your experiences. The least waste occurs when the group is packed just enough to win the district. It went live on November 16, 2009.

Kemp, 481 US 279 (1987), the defendant argued Georgia administers death sentences in a racially discriminatory manner in violation of Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Check out this new search engine called Xyggy Legal. David C. Baldus et al., McCleskey v. Kemp (1987): Denial, Avoidance, and the Legitimization of Racial Discrimination in the Administration of the Death Penalty, in Death Penalty Stories 229-275 (John H. Blume & Jordan M. Steiker eds., 2009), Reference Area KF9227.C2 D43 2009 Other readers will always be interested in your opinion of the books you've read. Graves 1990), and therefore “[t]he Constitution prohibits racially biased prosecutorial arguments,” McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279, 309 n.30 (1987). Whether you've loved the book or not, if you give your honest and detailed thoughts then people will find new books that are right for them. The Court ruled that racial discrimination must be shown in individual cases. In a unanimous ruling, the court held that Mexican Americans and all other nationality groups in the United States have equal protection under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This entry was posted in LexisNexis, Research and tagged Legal Search Engines, LexisNexis on September 8, 2014 by Loreen Peritz. Xyggy: a new legal search engine. Hernandez v. Texas, 347 U.S. 475 (1954), was a landmark case, "the first and only Mexican-American civil-rights case heard and decided by the United States Supreme Court during the post-World War II period." IV. Between these landmarks it has typically found gerrymanders impossible to detect. The Supreme Court has twice detected and struck down egregious, exotically shaped gerrymanders, in *Gomillion v. Lightfoot (1960) and again in *Shaw v. Reno (1993).